3proxy/bench/RESULTS.md

Benchmark results

3proxy against nginx, haproxy, envoy, squid, tinyproxy, dante and stunnel on two machines, as an HTTP proxy, through CONNECT and SOCKSv5 tunnels, as a TCP relay, ending or beginning TLS, and with 20000 connections open at once; and devel against 1.0.1. The current figures are from the evening of 13 October 2026, for devel with 16 KB buffers, the automatic splice() mode by default, the thread pool and the half-close fix; the sessions before them are at the end. How the benchmark works is in README.md; the measurements are in data/, and bench/report.py turns them into the tables below.

In short

Ranges are over the two machines, ARM and Intel; the tables give each.

• Bulk data: devel splices 32-48 Gbit/s through CONNECT, SOCKS and tcppm and 25-35 in 1 MB HTTP answers, the fastest everywhere: 2.2-3.1 times squid, 2-4.3 times dante, 2.7-6.1 times nginx and haproxy copying 1 MB answers and 1.5-2.2 times envoy, the fastest copying proxy. haproxy splice-auto is level with it as a relay on Intel and behind on ARM. Copying with its 16 KB buffers (-s0) devel does 9.4-14.4 Gbit/s, level with nginx and haproxy; the automatic mode, the default, is what makes 16 KB enough.
• Small requests: nginx and haproxy answer 1.5-2.3 times more 1 KB requests as relays and 1.8-2.9 times as HTTP proxies; squid 1.2-1.85 times more through CONNECT; through SOCKS dante leads on ARM, devel on Intel. 3proxy runs a thread per connection; splice() cannot change that.
• A new connection per request: nginx and haproxy do 1.35-1.5 times more as relays, 2.3-2.8 times as HTTP proxies, where they keep their connections to the origin and a forward proxy cannot.
• 2000 clients, 50 KB answers: on Intel devel leads as an HTTP proxy, through CONNECT and through SOCKS; on ARM nginx and envoy are 12% ahead of it as HTTP proxies, squid 41% through CONNECT, dante 29% through SOCKS. As a relay haproxy splice-auto leads on both.
• HTTPS: with TLS ended or begun in the proxy devel moves bulk data as fast as nginx, ahead of haproxy and stunnel, with the least memory; envoy (BoringSSL) leads, by 30-50% on ARM. devel answers half to two thirds of nginx's 1 KB requests and does 60-95% of its handshakes. See HTTPS.
• 20000 connections: devel does 63-95% of the best as an HTTP proxy and a relay and leads through CONNECT and SOCKS on Intel, with no failed exchange; it needs 65-90 KB per connection against 8-36 KB for nginx, haproxy and envoy. See the mix scenarios.
• Memory with few connections: 3proxy needs 4-23 MB, envoy 16-31 MB, nginx and haproxy 28-44 MB.

Setup

	M4	Skylake
host	Apple M4 Pro laptop, UTM (Apple Virtualization)	OpenStack virtual machine, KVM
virtual machine	8 CPUs, 8 GB	8 CPUs (Intel Xeon, Skylake, 2.0 GHz), 8 GB
system	Ubuntu 24.04, Linux 6.8, aarch64	AlmaLinux 10, Linux 6.12, x86_64
nginx	1.24.0	1.26.3
haproxy	2.8.16	3.0.5
squid	6.14	6.10
tinyproxy	1.11.1	1.11.2
dante	1.4.3	1.4.4
wrk, iperf3	4.1.0, 3.16	4.2.0, 3.17.1
proxychains-ng	4.17	4.17
envoy	1.34.1 (BoringSSL)	1.34.1 (BoringSSL)
stunnel, OpenSSL	5.72, 3.0.13	5.72, 3.5.8

How the client, the proxy and the origin were kept apart

• Network: each runs in a network namespace of its own, linked by veth pairs (client 10.0.1.2 - 10.0.1.1 proxy 10.0.2.1 - 10.0.2.2 origin), so they share no loopback and every proxy is crossed by the same path. MTU 1500.
• CPU: each runs in a cgroup pinned to CPUs of its own: the client (wrk, iperf3) on CPUs 0-3, the proxy on CPU 4, the origin (nginx serving files from tmpfs, iperf3 -s) on CPUs 5-7. RPS steers what each veth receives to the receiving side's CPUs, so the kernel's network work for a role is done on its own CPUs too. The proxy has the fewest CPUs on purpose: it has to be what runs out first.
• Every proxy gets the same CPU: one nginx worker, one haproxy thread, and 3proxy's thread per connection, squid's, tinyproxy's and dante's processes all confined to the same CPU.
• CPU time is the busy time of the role's CPUs from /proc/stat, its own processes plus the interrupts and softirqs handled there (a quarter of a proxy's time here), so a proxy is also charged for the kernel's work on its connections - which is where splice() moves the copying.
• Which side set the pace is recorded for every run: the role whose CPUs, or one thread of it, were busy at least 90% of the time.
• Repetitions: three runs of 10 seconds per proxy and scenario, the order of the proxies rotated between repetitions; the tables give medians.
• Tunnels: wrk and iperf3 run under proxychains-ng, which opens a CONNECT or SOCKSv5 tunnel for each connection they make, blocking in connect() until the proxy has answered. This costs the client CPU time per connection, so wrk gets more threads there (16 against 4).

Proxies

column	configuration
devel	devel as of the evening of 13 October (98fd0f3): 16 KB buffers, the thread pool, splice() in its automatic mode, the default: each direction switched to splice() once two reads in a row fill 16 KB and back to copying after three small ones; an HTTP body of known length is spliced when 16 KB or more of it remain; a half-closed connection relays the rest of the answer; an idle kept-alive connection gives up its request buffer
devel -s0	devel, no splice (TCP_NODELAY is on by default)
1.0.1	1.0.1 built without splice, 64 KB buffers, with TCP_NODELAY on both sides (-ocTCP_NODELAY -osTCP_NODELAY) as devel sets it by default
nginx	proxy_pass to an upstream with keepalive 1024, stream with proxy_half_close on for the TCP relay, reuseport
haproxy	mode http with http-reuse always, mode tcp for the TCP relay
haproxy splice-auto	option splice-auto: splices a direction once reads fill the buffer three times in a row
envoy	one worker (--concurrency 1), http_connection_manager with the router filter as an HTTP proxy for the origin, tcp_proxy for the TCP relay
squid	no cache, no logs, via off
tinyproxy	DisableViaHeader Yes, critical messages only
dante	no authentication, one sockd process tree (-N 1)
stunnel	TLS scenarios only

nginx and envoy have no splice() support. None of nginx, haproxy and envoy has CONNECT or SOCKS, so they are measured as HTTP proxies and TCP relays only; squid and tinyproxy only as HTTP proxies and through CONNECT, dante only through SOCKS. 3proxy versions are built with the Makefile they shipped with (-O3 -flto). Logging is off everywhere.

Scenarios

scenario	load
stream1, stream1-down	one iperf3 stream, upload and download
stream16	16 iperf3 streams, upload
ka-1k, http-ka-1k	1 KB answers over 64 kept-alive connections
http-ka-1m	1 MB answers over 16 kept-alive connections
ka-50k-2000, http-ka-50k-2000	2000 kept-alive connections, 50 KB answers
http-ka-2k-50k-2000	the same, each request a POST with a 2 KB body
close-1k, http-close-1k	64 connections, a new one for every request

http-* go through the HTTP proxy (absolute URIs). The CONNECT, SOCKS and relay tables run the same loads through a CONNECT tunnel, a SOCKSv5 tunnel or a TCP relay to the origin (3proxy tcppm, nginx stream, haproxy mode tcp): the HTTP requests are then plain HTTP inside the tunnel.

How to read the tables

• A table for each machine, ARM (the M4) and Intel (the Skylake host): the two are different machines in different conditions, and an average of them would mean nothing. Each cell is the median of three runs; TCP streams and 1 MB answers in Gbit/s, the other HTTP scenarios in thousands of requests per second. ‡: most runs were limited by the client or the origin rather than by the proxy, which can then do at least that much.
• Each table has the proxies copying through user space first, then, after ‖, those using splice(): devel, whose automatic mode is its default, and haproxy with splice-auto.
• HTTP proxy and TCP relay: bold is the best median of its group (copying, or splice()) in the row, and any other of the group whose runs cannot be told apart from it: its fastest run reaches the best one's slowest. * marks the best of the row over both groups, by the same rule.
• CONNECT and SOCKS, where devel is the only proxy using splice(): only the best of the row is marked, bold and with *.
• Latency tables: each cell the medians over the runs of their 50th and 99th percentile, in ms; bold is the lowest 99th percentile of its group and any other whose runs overlap it, * the lowest of the row. iperf3 streams have none. wrk runs a closed loop, each connection sending its next request once the answer is in, so a proxy answering fewer requests shows a longer median by that alone (64 connections at 16k requests a second are 4 ms each); what compares is the 99th percentile against the median, how evenly a proxy serves its connections, which matters most with 2000 clients. wrk leaves requests over 2 seconds out (they are counted as timeouts). The mix -3k runs are an open loop at a fixed rate, the ones where latency compares directly; mix counts in steps of a sixteenth of a power of two (16.4 means 16.4-17.4 ms).
• CPU time per gigabyte or request and peak memory are in the data. CPU adds little: every proxy ran at its CPU limit, so its CPU per unit of work is the inverse of its throughput.

HTTP proxy

Measured on the evening of 13 October 2026, as were the CONNECT, SOCKS and relay tables (data/ *-full-*.csv).

ARM (M4)

scenario (ARM)	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
ka-1k, k req/s	15.3	5.9	45.1 *	37.3	24.1	4.1	21.3	‖	15.4	44.8 *
ka-1m, Gbit/s	13.5	12.3	5.7 ‡	12.8	23.9 ‡	1.1	3.2 ‡	‖	35.0 ‡ *	5.9 ‡
ka-50k-2000, k req/s	8.9	9.2	9.6	11.3 *	11.2 *	1.7	4.6	‖	10.0	9.8
ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	8.1	7.8	8.8	10.3	11.3 *	1.6	3.5	‖	9.0	8.8
close-1k, k req/s	5.9	4.5	16.8 *	13.4	15.3	4.0	7.2	‖	5.9	16.7 *

Intel (Skylake)

scenario (Intel)	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
ka-1k, k req/s	17.2	6.1	32.7 *	31.6 *	9.9	3.8	8.8	‖	17.9	33.9 *
ka-1m, Gbit/s	9.4	12.4	7.3	5.8	11.8	1.1	2.1	‖	25.3 ‡ *	22.5 ‡ *
ka-50k-2000, k req/s	8.1	9.4 *	7.1	8.9 *	6.1	1.6	2.1	‖	9.6 *	7.1
ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	7.5	8.8 *	7.3	8.3	4.9	1.6	1.8	‖	9.4 *	7.1
close-1k, k req/s	5.8	3.9	14.8 *	12.9	5.8	3.6	3.9	‖	5.5	15.0 *

Latency, the 50th / 99th percentile in ms:

ARM (M4)

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
ka-1k	3.99 / 8.25	10.7 / 12.4	1.36 / 2.06 *	1.68 / 2.18 *	2.60 / 3.82	15.2 / 24.8	2.93 / 3.62	‖	3.98 / 8.14	1.37 / 2.05 *
ka-1m	9.75 / 16.0	10.9 / 11.8	23.1 / 27.6	10.3 / 15.9	5.58 / 8.26 *	123 / 148	39.7 / 48.1	‖	3.62 / 7.92 *	22.5 / 25.2
ka-50k-2000	67.9 / 256	69.5 / 226	196 / 539	83.4 / 96.9 *	172 / 394	625 / 1,490	224 / 367	‖	52.2 / 165	194 / 640
ka-2k-50k-2000	79.9 / 176	89.9 / 211	218 / 726	77.2 / 96.9 *	172 / 261	634 / 1,680	266 / 369	‖	68.1 / 171	217 / 700
close-1k	10.7 / 16.9	13.9 / 21.9	3.66 / 4.33 *	4.64 / 5.31	3.96 / 5.68	15.4 / 25.2	8.70 / 9.54	‖	10.7 / 17.1	3.69 / 4.34 *

Intel (Skylake)

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
ka-1k	3.51 / 7.53	10.4 / 11.9	1.90 / 3.12 *	1.86 / 2.90 *	6.05 / 10.2	16.2 / 26.9	6.94 / 10.5	‖	3.40 / 7.01	1.74 / 2.96 *
ka-1m	13.6 / 31.0	10.7 / 12.1	19.5 / 26.2	22.6 / 36.3	11.1 / 16.6	117 / 157	60.0 / 81.7	‖	5.01 / 11.9	5.62 / 9.29 *
ka-50k-2000	67.8 / 139	49.2 / 101 *	266 / 710	124 / 166	314 / 540	646 / 1,700	485 / 578	‖	60.4 / 127 *	261 / 673
ka-2k-50k-2000	76.4 / 150	56.3 / 101 *	262 / 658	130 / 174	383 / 608	657 / 1,680	560 / 631	‖	56.4 / 108 *	268 / 728
close-1k	10.5 / 19.6	15.5 / 27.5	3.94 / 5.99 *	4.56 / 6.71	10.7 / 16.9	16.6 / 28.1	15.6 / 21.2	‖	10.8 / 22.1	3.99 / 5.86 *

• 1 MB answers: devel splices them at 35 Gbit/s on ARM and 25 on Intel, 2.7 to 6.1 times nginx and haproxy copying and 1.5-2.1 times envoy, the fastest of the copying proxies here. haproxy splice-auto keeps up on Intel (22.5) but hardly splices on ARM (5.9).
• 2000 clients with 50 KB answers: nginx and envoy lead on ARM (11.3k requests a second against devel's 10.0k), devel on Intel (9.6k against nginx's 8.9k); haproxy is behind both on both. With a 2 KB POST each, the same order, envoy first on ARM.
• nginx and haproxy answer 2.4-2.9 times more 1 KB requests over kept-alive connections on ARM, 1.8-1.9 times on Intel, and 2.3-2.8 times more with a new connection for each. That last gap is not the thread pool's: nginx (keepalive 1024) and haproxy (http-reuse always) keep their connections to the origin and only accept and close the client's, while a forward proxy such as 3proxy also opens and closes one to the server for every client connection. As a TCP relay, where every proxy does, the gap is 1.5 times on ARM and 1.35 on Intel.
• envoy is close to nginx on ARM and well behind it on Intel (9.9k 1 KB requests against 31.6k, 5.8k new connections a second against 12.9k).
• 1.0.1, with TCP_NODELAY set this time, answers 6k 1 KB requests a second over kept-alive connections (1.5k without it): one every 10.6 ms on each of the 64 connections, held by a 10 ms sleep removed in devel.
• Latency: with 2000 clients devel's 99th percentile is 108-171 ms, nginx's 97-174 ms and the closest to its median, haproxy's 540-730 ms and envoy's 260-610 ms. With 1 KB requests devel's is 7-8 ms against 2-3 for nginx and haproxy, which answer twice as many.

CONNECT tunnel

ARM (M4)

scenario (ARM)	devel -s0	1.0.1	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel
stream1-down, Gbit/s	14.4	22.7	1.3	15.2	‖	47.3 ‡ *
stream16, Gbit/s	13.7	21.1	1.3	17.7	‖	38.5 ‡ *
ka-1k, k req/s	19.7	19.7	17.1	36.4 ‡ *	‖	19.7
ka-50k-2000, k req/s	9.5	11.2	2.2	16.1 *	‖	11.4
ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	8.7	10.4	2.2	15.1 *	‖	10.6
close-1k, k req/s	4.6 ‡	3.7 ‡	4.1 ‡	5.3 ‡ *	‖	4.6 ‡

Intel (Skylake)

scenario (Intel)	devel -s0	1.0.1	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel
stream1-down, Gbit/s	10.0	20.3	1.2	13.9	‖	33.9 *
stream16, Gbit/s	10.1	19.6	1.3	13.2	‖	32.4 *
ka-1k, k req/s	31.6	31.8	30.2	37.0 *	‖	30.8
ka-50k-2000, k req/s	10.5	13.3	2.5	11.7	‖	15.8 *
ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	9.8	12.8	2.4	11.4	‖	14.6 *
close-1k, k req/s	5.3 ‡	3.7	5.1 ‡	3.7	‖	5.3 ‡ *

Latency, the 50th / 99th percentile in ms:

ARM (M4)

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel
ka-1k	3.04 / 6.80	3.04 / 6.78	3.59 / 6.71	1.74 / 2.13 *	‖	3.04 / 6.74
ka-50k-2000	178 / 354	147 / 320	757 / 1,120	118 / 130 *	‖	145 / 318
ka-2k-50k-2000	195 / 367	157 / 326	750 / 1,190	126 / 136 *	‖	159 / 321
close-1k	5.49 / 13.6	6.34 / 15.7	5.99 / 15.0	5.34 / 10.5 *	‖	5.20 / 13.3

Intel (Skylake)

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel
ka-1k	1.94 / 3.42	1.92 / 3.54	2.03 / 3.55	1.63 / 2.63 *	‖	1.97 / 3.54
ka-50k-2000	135 / 253	109 / 223	477 / 1,390	160 / 185 *	‖	82.4 / 213
ka-2k-50k-2000	118 / 270	110 / 203	463 / 1,380	163 / 177 *	‖	86.0 / 176 *
close-1k	3.75 / 11.8 *	5.29 / 16.0	3.70 / 11.0 *	6.80 / 15.2	‖	3.31 / 11.3 *

• With splice() devel moves 32-47 Gbit/s through a tunnel, 2.2-3.1 times squid; copying with 16 KB buffers (-s0) it does 10-14, below 1.0.1's 20-23 with its 64 KB buffers, which is what the automatic mode is for.
• squid answers 1 KB requests 1.85 times as fast as devel on ARM, 20% faster on Intel; with 2000 clients squid leads on ARM (16.1k against 11.4k), devel on Intel (15.8k against 11.7k).
• With a new tunnel per request proxychains on the client sets the pace on ARM; on Intel devel does 5.3k a second, squid 3.7k.
• Latency: squid serves 2000 clients the most evenly, its 99th percentile 130-185 ms against devel's 210-320.

SOCKSv5 tunnel

ARM (M4)

scenario (ARM)	devel -s0	1.0.1	dante	‖	devel
stream1-down, Gbit/s	13.9	22.8	11.2	‖	48.1 ‡ *
stream16, Gbit/s	14.2	21.0	14.6	‖	38.5 ‡ *
ka-1k, k req/s	19.7	19.7	28.5 *	‖	19.7
ka-50k-2000, k req/s	9.4	11.1	14.7 *	‖	11.4
ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	8.7	10.3	13.9 *	‖	10.5
close-1k, k req/s	4.4 *	3.6	3.8	‖	4.4 *

Intel (Skylake)

scenario (Intel)	devel -s0	1.0.1	dante	‖	devel
stream1-down, Gbit/s	10.2	20.7	8.2	‖	33.3 *
stream16, Gbit/s	10.2	19.3	15.9	‖	31.9 *
ka-1k, k req/s	31.4 *	31.2 *	25.6	‖	30.4 *
ka-50k-2000, k req/s	10.4	13.4	12.5	‖	15.8 *
ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	10.1	12.7	11.5	‖	14.7 *
close-1k, k req/s	5.3 *	3.9	1.6	‖	5.1 *

Latency, the 50th / 99th percentile in ms:

ARM (M4)

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	dante	‖	devel
ka-1k	3.03 / 6.75	3.03 / 6.75	1.15 / 4.34 *	‖	3.03 / 6.73
ka-50k-2000	183 / 355	144 / 610	185 / 198 *	‖	150 / 321
ka-2k-50k-2000	203 / 367	163 / 331	186 / 201 *	‖	164 / 322
close-1k	5.48 / 14.0 *	5.91 / 15.8	6.11 / 17.8	‖	5.40 / 14.0 *

Intel (Skylake)

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	dante	‖	devel
ka-1k	1.93 / 3.62 *	1.97 / 3.48 *	1.46 / 5.66	‖	1.98 / 3.72 *
ka-50k-2000	137 / 257	118 / 221	2.25 / 328	‖	82.0 / 186 *
ka-2k-50k-2000	152 / 267	119 / 218	2.35 / 331	‖	101 / 195 *
close-1k	3.49 / 11.2 *	4.81 / 15.0	14.1 / 40.0	‖	3.75 / 12.2 *

• devel moves 32-48 Gbit/s with splice(), 2-4.3 times dante.
• On ARM dante answers 45% more 1 KB requests and 29% more with 2000 clients; on Intel devel leads both (by 19% and 26%).
• With a new tunnel per request devel manages 4.4-5.3k a second, dante 3.8k on ARM and 1.6k on Intel.
• Latency: with 2000 clients dante's 99th percentile is 200-330 ms, devel's 190-320.

TCP relay

ARM (M4)

scenario (ARM)	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
stream1-down, Gbit/s	14.0	22.5	13.4	13.4	29.2	‖	48.0 ‡ *	30.4
stream16, Gbit/s	13.8	21.0	9.7 ‡	13.7	20.3	‖	38.3 ‡ *	16.4 ‡
ka-1k, k req/s	20.3	20.1	46.2 *	44.2	35.5	‖	20.2	43.9 *
ka-50k-2000, k req/s	10.4	12.2	11.2	14.5	15.1	‖	12.6	17.4 *
ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	9.7	11.3	11.3	13.4	13.9	‖	11.6	17.1 *
close-1k, k req/s	6.4	5.1	9.7 *	8.8	9.6 *	‖	6.4	9.7 *

Intel (Skylake)

scenario (Intel)	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
stream1-down, Gbit/s	10.1	19.3	9.8	9.4	18.2	‖	33.2 *	32.7 *
stream16, Gbit/s	9.7	19.2	9.2	9.7	14.7	‖	32.3 *	30.7 ‡
ka-1k, k req/s	29.8	30.9	48.3 *	49.3 *	36.6	‖	30.6	46.8
ka-50k-2000, k req/s	11.0	15.0	10.2	12.3	12.8	‖	18.1	19.9 *
ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	10.5	13.8	9.7	12.1	12.4	‖	16.4	18.6 *
close-1k, k req/s	6.8	4.8	8.8 *	8.6 *	5.4	‖	6.5	8.7 *

Latency, the 50th / 99th percentile in ms:

ARM (M4)

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
ka-1k	2.96 / 6.86	2.98 / 6.92	1.33 / 1.98	1.41 / 1.89 *	1.72 / 2.70	‖	2.97 / 6.97	1.38 / 2.13
ka-50k-2000	55.3 / 169	47.8 / 162	177 / 1,010	55.8 / 77.5 *	130 / 219	‖	43.8 / 309	82.5 / 932
ka-2k-50k-2000	58.6 / 156	52.1 / 153	172 / 1,110	65.5 / 81.0 *	140 / 234	‖	50.1 / 260	82.5 / 1,180
close-1k	9.71 / 16.3	12.3 / 19.5	6.49 / 7.28 *	7.11 / 7.99	6.34 / 9.16	‖	9.72 / 16.3	6.47 / 7.29 *

Intel (Skylake)

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
ka-1k	2.02 / 4.14	1.98 / 3.99	1.28 / 1.84 *	1.24 / 1.82 *	1.64 / 2.87	‖	1.98 / 3.98	1.29 / 1.87 *
ka-50k-2000	36.3 / 86.2	28.9 / 65.7	190 / 978	79.8 / 105	150 / 348	‖	23.4 / 49.9 *	90.8 / 744
ka-2k-50k-2000	40.5 / 94.5	32.6 / 68.7 *	196 / 1,110	80.9 / 100	154 / 386	‖	25.4 / 47.5 *	97.2 / 750
close-1k	9.16 / 16.6	12.7 / 24.0	6.99 / 9.78 *	7.09 / 10.2 *	11.3 / 16.8	‖	9.33 / 17.7	7.08 / 10.0 *

• On streams devel splices 32-48 Gbit/s; haproxy splice-auto is level on Intel (32.7 and 30.7), behind on ARM (30 and 16). Of the copying proxies envoy is level with 1.0.1 and its 64 KB buffers on one stream (18-29), devel splicing 1.6-2.2 times either.
• nginx and haproxy answer 2.2-2.3 times more 1 KB requests on ARM, 1.5-1.6 times on Intel.
• With 2000 clients and 50 KB answers haproxy splice-auto leads, 38% ahead of devel on ARM and 10% on Intel.
• nginx runs with proxy_half_close on (nginx::halfclose), off by default, without which its relays cut short the exchanges whose client shuts down its sending side first.
• Latency: with 2000 clients nginx's 99th percentile is 78-105 ms; devel's is 48-50 ms on Intel, the lowest, and 260-310 ms on ARM; haproxy's about a second, with or without splice().

HTTPS: TLS in the proxy

Measured on 13 October 2026 with devel as of the evening: 16 KB buffers, splice() in its automatic mode, the thread pool, TLS read a record ahead and relayed a full record per write (data/ *-tls.csv). Every proxy relays TCP, ending TLS (term: TLS from the client, plain TCP to the origin) or beginning it (init: plain TCP from the client, TLS to the origin): 3proxy tcppm under ssl_serv / ssl_cli, nginx stream with ssl and proxy_ssl, haproxy mode tcp with ssl crt and server ... ssl, envoy tcp_proxy with TLS transport sockets, stunnel. ECDSA P-256 certificate, TLS 1.3; envoy uses BoringSSL, the others OpenSSL (3.0.13 on ARM, 3.5.8 on Intel). "no proxy" is the client speaking TLS to the origin itself. The *-ka-* and *-close-* scenarios are wrk over HTTPS, the *-stream* ones iperf3 wrapped in TLS by bench/mix tls; on one stream that wrapper, a Go program on one core, can set the pace (‡).

ARM (M4)

throughput, Gbit/s (thousands of requests per second for HTTP)

scenario	no proxy	‖	devel	haproxy	nginx	envoy	stunnel
tls-term-ka-1k	1.43 (139.2k/s)	‖	0.17 (16.8k/s)	0.33 (31.9k/s)	0.34 (33.4k/s)	0.32 (30.9k/s)	0.14 (13.9k/s)
tls-term-ka-1m	29.81 (3.5k/s)	‖	7.20 (0.9k/s)	4.88 (0.6k/s) ‡	7.24 (0.9k/s)	10.57 (1.3k/s) ‡	4.66 (0.6k/s)
tls-term-close-1k	0.13 (12.3k/s)	‖	0.03 (2.7k/s) ‡	0.03 (2.8k/s) ‡	0.03 (3.3k/s) ‡	0.04 (3.9k/s) ‡	0.02 (1.9k/s) ‡
tls-term-stream1-down	9.3	‖	9.2 ‡	8.8 ‡	8.6 ‡	9.6 ‡	4.7
tls-term-stream16	19.3	‖	6.7	5.0	6.7	9.4	4.3
tls-init-ka-1k	1.43 (138.8k/s)	‖	0.18 (17.2k/s)	0.33 (32.4k/s)	0.35 (33.7k/s)	0.32 (31.3k/s)	0.15 (14.2k/s)
tls-init-ka-1m	28.69 (3.4k/s)	‖	6.14 (0.7k/s)	4.63 (0.6k/s)	5.84 (0.7k/s)	8.59 (1.0k/s)	4.19 (0.5k/s)
tls-init-close-1k	0.13 (12.2k/s)	‖	0.02 (2.0k/s)	0.03 (2.5k/s)	0.03 (3.4k/s)	0.06 (5.7k/s)	0.02 (1.9k/s)
tls-init-stream1-down	9.2	‖	7.2	5.8	7.2	10.9	4.4
tls-init-stream16	19.6	‖	8.3 ‡	5.9 ‡	7.8 ‡	11.0 ‡	5.2 ‡

proxy CPU time per gigabyte or per request

scenario	no proxy	‖	devel	haproxy	nginx	envoy	stunnel
tls-term-ka-1k	–	‖	60 µs/req	31 µs/req	30 µs/req	32 µs/req	72 µs/req
tls-term-ka-1m	–	‖	1.11 s/GB	1.66 s/GB	1.10 s/GB	0.76 s/GB	1.72 s/GB
tls-term-close-1k	–	‖	370 µs/req	358 µs/req	307 µs/req	255 µs/req	514 µs/req
tls-term-stream1-down	–	‖	0.85 s/GB	0.87 s/GB	0.91 s/GB	0.77 s/GB	1.70 s/GB
tls-term-stream16	–	‖	1.20 s/GB	1.60 s/GB	1.20 s/GB	0.85 s/GB	1.88 s/GB
tls-init-ka-1k	–	‖	58 µs/req	31 µs/req	30 µs/req	32 µs/req	71 µs/req
tls-init-ka-1m	–	‖	1.31 s/GB	1.75 s/GB	1.37 s/GB	0.93 s/GB	1.92 s/GB
tls-init-close-1k	–	‖	499 µs/req	408 µs/req	297 µs/req	176 µs/req	518 µs/req
tls-init-stream1-down	–	‖	1.11 s/GB	1.37 s/GB	1.11 s/GB	0.74 s/GB	1.81 s/GB
tls-init-stream16	–	‖	0.96 s/GB	1.35 s/GB	1.03 s/GB	0.73 s/GB	1.53 s/GB

proxy peak memory, MB

scenario	no proxy	‖	devel	haproxy	nginx	envoy	stunnel
tls-term-ka-1k	–	‖	12	36	32	18	13
tls-term-ka-1m	–	‖	15	43	44	41	13
tls-term-close-1k	–	‖	14	37	32	19	21
tls-term-stream1-down	–	‖	7	40	34	26	5
tls-term-stream16	–	‖	26	55	53	66	21
tls-init-ka-1k	–	‖	13	37	33	17	14
tls-init-ka-1m	–	‖	16	49	44	41	18
tls-init-close-1k	–	‖	17	38	33	19	19
tls-init-stream1-down	–	‖	6	40	37	25	6
tls-init-stream16	–	‖	62	59	72	122	56

Intel (Skylake)

throughput, Gbit/s (thousands of requests per second for HTTP)

scenario	no proxy	‖	devel	haproxy	nginx	envoy	stunnel
tls-term-ka-1k	0.97 (95.0k/s)	‖	0.23 (22.5k/s)	0.33 (32.5k/s)	0.34 (33.4k/s)	0.28 (27.1k/s)	0.19 (18.2k/s)
tls-term-ka-1m	19.50 (2.3k/s)	‖	5.90 (0.7k/s)	5.48 (0.7k/s)	5.82 (0.7k/s)	5.80 (0.7k/s)	4.51 (0.5k/s)
tls-term-close-1k	0.03 (3.3k/s)	‖	0.01 (1.2k/s) ‡	0.01 (1.3k/s) ‡	0.01 (1.3k/s) ‡	0.02 (2.0k/s) ‡	0.01 (1.0k/s) ‡
tls-term-stream1-down	7.1	‖	5.6	6.1	5.9	6.9	5.1
tls-term-stream16	16.2	‖	5.9	5.0	5.7	6.8	4.7
tls-init-ka-1k	0.97 (95.2k/s)	‖	0.24 (23.1k/s)	0.32 (31.1k/s)	0.31 (30.6k/s)	0.30 (29.3k/s)	0.19 (18.4k/s)
tls-init-ka-1m	20.70 (2.5k/s)	‖	5.22 (0.6k/s)	4.85 (0.6k/s)	5.34 (0.6k/s)	6.35 (0.8k/s)	4.41 (0.5k/s)
tls-init-close-1k	0.03 (3.3k/s)	‖	0.01 (0.8k/s)	0.01 (1.0k/s)	0.01 (1.2k/s)	0.03 (3.0k/s)	0.01 (0.9k/s)
tls-init-stream1-down	7.5	‖	6.1	5.2	6.0	7.8	4.7
tls-init-stream16	16.7	‖	7.1	5.9 ‡	6.8	7.3	5.6

proxy CPU time per gigabyte or per request

scenario	no proxy	‖	devel	haproxy	nginx	envoy	stunnel
tls-term-ka-1k	–	‖	44 µs/req	31 µs/req	30 µs/req	37 µs/req	55 µs/req
tls-term-ka-1m	–	‖	1.36 s/GB	1.47 s/GB	1.38 s/GB	1.38 s/GB	1.78 s/GB
tls-term-close-1k	–	‖	821 µs/req	774 µs/req	781 µs/req	510 µs/req	1,022 µs/req
tls-term-stream1-down	–	‖	1.38 s/GB	1.28 s/GB	1.32 s/GB	1.08 s/GB	1.57 s/GB
tls-term-stream16	–	‖	1.35 s/GB	1.61 s/GB	1.40 s/GB	1.18 s/GB	1.69 s/GB
tls-init-ka-1k	–	‖	43 µs/req	32 µs/req	33 µs/req	34 µs/req	55 µs/req
tls-init-ka-1m	–	‖	1.53 s/GB	1.67 s/GB	1.50 s/GB	1.26 s/GB	1.82 s/GB
tls-init-close-1k	–	‖	1,187 µs/req	1,041 µs/req	828 µs/req	336 µs/req	1,070 µs/req
tls-init-stream1-down	–	‖	1.30 s/GB	1.53 s/GB	1.34 s/GB	1.03 s/GB	1.71 s/GB
tls-init-stream16	–	‖	1.14 s/GB	1.37 s/GB	1.17 s/GB	1.11 s/GB	1.43 s/GB

proxy peak memory, MB

scenario	no proxy	‖	devel	haproxy	nginx	envoy	stunnel
tls-term-ka-1k	–	‖	14	37	35	24	16
tls-term-ka-1m	–	‖	20	49	48	46	20
tls-term-close-1k	–	‖	24	38	34	26	34
tls-term-stream1-down	–	‖	8	39	36	33	8
tls-term-stream16	–	‖	80	44	85	138	89
tls-init-ka-1k	–	‖	16	41	36	24	17
tls-init-ka-1m	–	‖	18	50	46	48	21
tls-init-close-1k	–	‖	59	40	35	27	34
tls-init-stream1-down	–	‖	11	39	35	32	10
tls-init-stream16	–	‖	95	55	114	148	97

• Bulk data: devel is level with nginx and ahead of stunnel on both machines, and ahead of haproxy but for one stream ending TLS on Intel; envoy leads on ARM by 30-50% with a third less CPU per gigabyte, and on Intel by 0-30%. BoringSSL's ciphers on ARM are the likely difference: on Intel, ending TLS for 1 MB answers, the four are level.
• 1 KB requests over kept-alive connections: devel answers half of what nginx, haproxy and envoy do on ARM and two thirds on Intel, the same share as without TLS: the thread per connection sets it, not TLS. stunnel, a thread per connection too, is below devel.
• A handshake for every request: ending TLS devel does 80-95% of nginx and haproxy, beginning it 60-80%; nginx and haproxy resume the session to the server, devel makes a full handshake each time. envoy does 1.2-1.5 times nginx ending TLS and 1.7-2.5 times beginning it.
• Memory: with one connection or a few dozen, devel and stunnel need the least, mostly 6-24 MB (devel 59 MB beginning a TLS connection per request on Intel), against 32-50 MB for nginx and haproxy and 17-48 MB for envoy. With 16 streams on Intel haproxy needs the least (44-55 MB, devel 80-95), and envoy the most everywhere (66-148 MB).

Many connections: the mix scenarios

Measured on the evening of 13 October 2026 with the same devel (data/ *-full-mix.csv), 20000 connections open through the proxy, --mix-active 2000; -3k at a fixed 3000 exchanges a second. dante is left out on Intel: with 20000 connections it needs more memory than the machine has (6.5 GB on ARM) and the OOM killer ended the origin. ‡: limited by the client.

ARM (M4)

throughput, Gbit/s (thousands of requests per second for HTTP)

scenario	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	dante	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
mix-http	1.72 (4.7k/s)	1.48 (4.1k/s)	2.02 (6.8k/s) ‡	2.92 (8.0k/s) ‡	2.52 (6.9k/s) ‡	0.62 (1.6k/s)	0.99 (2.9k/s) ‡	– (–k/s)	‖	1.84 (5.0k/s)	2.06 (7.0k/s) ‡
mix-connect	2.25 (6.0k/s)	2.02 (5.4k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	0.78 (2.2k/s)	2.78 (7.4k/s) ‡	– (–k/s)	‖	2.13 (5.7k/s) ‡	– (–k/s)
mix-socks	2.11 (5.7k/s)	2.07 (5.5k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	1.34 (3.6k/s)	‖	2.21 (6.0k/s) ‡	– (–k/s)
mix-relay	2.17 (6.0k/s)	2.15 (5.9k/s)	2.49 (7.2k/s) ‡	2.86 (7.8k/s) ‡	2.77 (7.6k/s) ‡	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	‖	2.28 (6.3k/s) ‡	2.66 (7.6k/s) ‡
mix-http-3k	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	0.63 (1.6k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)	‖	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)
mix-connect-3k	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	0.78 (2.1k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)	‖	1.08 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)
mix-socks-3k	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	1.14 (3.0k/s)	‖	1.08 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)
mix-relay-3k	1.09 (3.0k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	‖	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)

proxy CPU time per gigabyte or per request

scenario	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	dante	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
mix-http	215 µs/req	257 µs/req	150 µs/req	127 µs/req	147 µs/req	660 µs/req	351 µs/req	– µs/req	‖	210 µs/req	146 µs/req
mix-connect	173 µs/req	189 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	477 µs/req	139 µs/req	– µs/req	‖	184 µs/req	– µs/req
mix-socks	180 µs/req	191 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	294 µs/req	‖	172 µs/req	– µs/req
mix-relay	172 µs/req	179 µs/req	140 µs/req	130 µs/req	139 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	‖	164 µs/req	134 µs/req
mix-http-3k	224 µs/req	255 µs/req	154 µs/req	162 µs/req	184 µs/req	631 µs/req	295 µs/req	– µs/req	‖	230 µs/req	155 µs/req
mix-connect-3k	201 µs/req	211 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	482 µs/req	193 µs/req	– µs/req	‖	202 µs/req	– µs/req
mix-socks-3k	212 µs/req	206 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	343 µs/req	‖	201 µs/req	– µs/req
mix-relay-3k	205 µs/req	207 µs/req	170 µs/req	167 µs/req	174 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	‖	206 µs/req	167 µs/req

proxy peak memory, MB

scenario	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	dante	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
mix-http	1,613	2,730	531	151	587	819	839	–	‖	1,681	548
mix-connect	1,494	3,220	–	–	–	1,007	1,774	–	‖	1,774	–
mix-socks	1,462	1,948	–	–	–	–	–	6,518	‖	1,496	–
mix-relay	1,248	1,789	292	617	645	–	–	–	‖	1,284	269
mix-http-3k	1,564	2,756	150	144	386	800	609	–	‖	1,592	156
mix-connect-3k	1,412	2,835	–	–	–	1,027	1,292	–	‖	1,428	–
mix-socks-3k	1,405	1,559	–	–	–	–	–	6,627	‖	1,422	–
mix-relay-3k	1,293	1,462	268	576	598	–	–	–	‖	1,308	268

latency, 50th / 99th percentile, ms

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	dante	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
mix-http	19.5 / 6,291	12.8 / 8,126	8.70 / 3,146	4.35 / 3,932	262 / 393 *	65.5 / 6,291	262 / 5,243	–	‖	17.4 / 6,291	8.19 / 3,146
mix-connect	47.1 / 4,456	38.9 / 5,505	–	–	–	98.3 / 6,816	13.8 / 3,670 *	–	‖	57.3 / 4,719	–
mix-socks	69.6 / 4,456 *	36.9 / 5,243	–	–	–	–	–	131 / 5,243 *	‖	45.1 / 4,456 *	–
mix-relay	13.8 / 5,243	7.42 / 5,243	34.8 / 3,277	4.10 / 3,801	246 / 393 *	–	–	–	‖	13.8 / 4,719	30.7 / 3,277
mix-http-3k	1.47 / 16.4 *	1.86 / 21.5	1.15 / 16.4 *	1.22 / 16.4 *	1.28 / 16.4 *	1,507 / 6,291	2.18 / 26.6	–	‖	1.47 / 16.4 *	1.15 / 16.4 *
mix-connect-3k	1.28 / 16.4 *	1.28 / 16.4 *	–	–	–	1,507 / 6,291	1.28 / 16.4 *	–	‖	1.28 / 16.4 *	–
mix-socks-3k	1.34 / 16.4 *	1.28 / 16.4 *	–	–	–	–	–	63.5 / 5,243	‖	1.28 / 16.4 *	–
mix-relay-3k	1.28 / 16.4 *	1.28 / 16.4 *	1.22 / 16.4 *	1.15 / 16.4 *	1.22 / 16.4 *	–	–	–	‖	1.28 / 16.4 *	1.22 / 16.4 *

Intel (Skylake)

throughput, Gbit/s (thousands of requests per second for HTTP)

scenario	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
mix-http	2.14 (5.9k/s)	2.04 (5.6k/s)	2.42 (7.4k/s)	2.94 (8.0k/s)	2.04 (5.6k/s)	0.65 (1.7k/s)	0.82 (2.4k/s)	‖	2.43 (6.7k/s)	3.19 (9.1k/s)
mix-connect	3.02 (8.1k/s)	3.03 (8.1k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	1.04 (2.9k/s)	2.86 (7.6k/s)	‖	3.48 (9.3k/s)	– (–k/s)
mix-socks	3.08 (8.4k/s)	3.25 (8.7k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	‖	3.41 (9.2k/s)	– (–k/s)
mix-relay	3.09 (8.5k/s)	3.26 (9.0k/s)	2.53 (7.9k/s)	3.66 (10.0k/s) ‡	3.24 (8.9k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	‖	3.46 (9.5k/s)	3.27 (9.2k/s)
mix-http-3k	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	1.09 (3.0k/s)	0.66 (1.7k/s)	0.79 (2.3k/s)	‖	1.09 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)
mix-connect-3k	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	1.06 (2.9k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	‖	1.08 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)
mix-socks-3k	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	‖	1.08 (3.0k/s)	– (–k/s)
mix-relay-3k	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)	1.22 (3.3k/s)	– (–k/s)	– (–k/s)	‖	1.09 (3.0k/s)	1.08 (3.0k/s)

proxy CPU time per gigabyte or per request

scenario	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
mix-http	178 µs/req	186 µs/req	140 µs/req	129 µs/req	188 µs/req	630 µs/req	436 µs/req	‖	155 µs/req	115 µs/req
mix-connect	127 µs/req	126 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	362 µs/req	137 µs/req	‖	113 µs/req	– µs/req
mix-socks	127 µs/req	122 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	‖	115 µs/req	– µs/req
mix-relay	122 µs/req	116 µs/req	133 µs/req	104 µs/req	117 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	‖	110 µs/req	113 µs/req
mix-http-3k	217 µs/req	223 µs/req	166 µs/req	181 µs/req	236 µs/req	626 µs/req	459 µs/req	‖	204 µs/req	154 µs/req
mix-connect-3k	171 µs/req	167 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	358 µs/req	185 µs/req	‖	160 µs/req	– µs/req
mix-socks-3k	179 µs/req	165 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	‖	167 µs/req	– µs/req
mix-relay-3k	173 µs/req	167 µs/req	162 µs/req	159 µs/req	158 µs/req	– µs/req	– µs/req	‖	166 µs/req	154 µs/req

proxy peak memory, MB

scenario	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
mix-http	1,765	2,851	489	220	609	786	650	‖	1,813	434
mix-connect	1,411	3,280	–	–	–	1,062	1,839	‖	1,442	–
mix-socks	1,408	2,157	–	–	–	–	–	‖	1,444	–
mix-relay	1,289	1,809	477	662	723	–	–	‖	1,324	340
mix-http-3k	1,622	2,817	172	153	414	765	613	‖	1,625	179
mix-connect-3k	1,403	2,837	–	–	–	1,034	1,378	‖	1,416	–
mix-socks-3k	1,400	1,573	–	–	–	–	–	‖	1,413	–
mix-relay-3k	1,357	1,529	315	625	614	–	–	‖	1,372	321

latency, 50th / 99th percentile, ms

scenario, p50 / p99 ms	devel -s0	1.0.1	haproxy	nginx	envoy	tinyproxy	squid	‖	devel	haproxy splice-auto
mix-http	6.14 / 5,767	4.86 / 5,767	115 / 2,621	8.19 / 3,801	344 / 475 *	81.9 / 5,505	36.9 / 7,340	‖	4.61 / 4,981	139 / 1,311
mix-connect	4.35 / 3,539	5.89 / 3,408	–	–	–	77.8 / 5,505	12.8 / 3,670	‖	3.07 / 3,146 *	–
mix-socks	4.61 / 3,277 *	4.86 / 3,146 *	–	–	–	–	–	‖	3.33 / 3,146 *	–
mix-relay	2.56 / 3,670	3.33 / 3,277	111 / 2,621	3.46 / 2,884	213 / 344 *	–	–	‖	1.98 / 3,146	69.6 / 2,359
mix-http-3k	1.34 / 16.4 *	1.47 / 21.5	1.22 / 16.4 *	1.28 / 19.5 *	1.66 / 17.4 *	1,049 / 5,767	1,245 / 7,078	‖	1.34 / 17.4 *	1.15 / 17.4 *
mix-connect-3k	1.15 / 16.4 *	1.15 / 17.4 *	–	–	–	24.6 / 2,228	1.28 / 18.4	‖	1.15 / 17.4 *	–
mix-socks-3k	1.15 / 16.4 *	1.15 / 16.4 *	–	–	–	–	–	‖	1.15 / 17.4 *	–
mix-relay-3k	1.15 / 16.4 *	1.15 / 17.4 *	1.15 / 16.4 *	1.15 / 16.4 *	1.47 / 1,114	–	–	‖	1.15 / 16.4 *	1.15 / 16.4 *

• Many small exchanges: devel does 63% of nginx's as an HTTP proxy on ARM, 74% of haproxy splice-auto's on Intel, and 81-95% of nginx's as a relay; through CONNECT and SOCKS it leads on Intel. At a fixed rate it takes 8-23% more CPU than the best as a relay, 32-49% more as an HTTP proxy; through CONNECT 5% more than squid on ARM and 14% less on Intel, through SOCKS 41% less than dante.
• Memory is where a thread per connection shows: 65-75 KB a connection for a relay or a SOCKS tunnel (the thread's stack and two 16 KB buffers), 70-90 KB for an HTTP proxy or CONNECT connection, against 8-36 KB for nginx, haproxy and envoy. That is 30-45% less than in the morning session (120-140 KB for HTTP and CONNECT): devel now frees the request buffer of a kept-alive connection idle for a second, and before relaying a CONNECT tunnel.
• No exchange failed through devel, or through nginx relaying with proxy_half_close on. 1.0.1 still loses 1-5 a run in the tunnels and relays, exchanges half-closed by the client with a large answer cut short, the bug fixed in devel (and in master and 0.9) since the morning session.
• envoy at the fixed rate on Intel relays more than 3000 a second: it fell behind at times (p99 0.7-1.2 s) and the client made up the delayed exchanges.
• Latency: at the fixed rate devel answers in 1.15-1.47 ms (median) and 16.4-17.4 ms (99th percentile), as nginx and haproxy do; tinyproxy, squid as an HTTP proxy on Intel and dante on ARM fall behind, to seconds. With 2000 exchanges in flight every proxy queues them, to 99th percentiles of 1.3-8 seconds, but envoy, which keeps them to 340-480 ms around a median of 210-340.

Earlier sessions

The morning session of 13 October (data/ *-16k-*.csv, *-mix.csv) ran devel before the half-close fix, the idle buffer release and the TLS changes, 1.0.1 without TCP_NODELAY and nginx relays without proxy_half_close, and had no envoy. Its ARM figures are 5-15% lower for every proxy alike, probably because two stray 3proxy processes were spinning on the host's CPUs at the time.

The session of 11-12 October, devel with 64 KB buffers, splice() by direction (-s1, -s3) and the automatic mode as an option, against 0.9.4, 1.0.1 and the same proxies, is in data/ (*-auto-http.csv, *-tunnels.csv).

The tables below are older still: from devel before the automatic mode, whose -s then spliced both directions always, making a pair of pipes for each mapping (sockmap() call), and before squid, tinyproxy and dante were added. In the first table "devel" is -s0 and "devel splice" -s3 of today. The haproxy splice columns there come from a second session an hour later, with plain haproxy run again to see how far the conditions moved: by 2.5% or less on the M4 and 7.5% or less on the Skylake host, except for one origin-bound case (-9.7%).

• A few results were limited by the client or the origin rather than by the proxy, which can then do more than shown: on the M4, devel splice with single and 16 streams (the receiving iperf3 thread at a full core), haproxy with 16 streams, and several of the 1 MB HTTP runs. The per-run bound column in data/ has the detail; bench/report.py on one machine's files marks them.
• http-ka-50k-2000: every proxy but haproxy leaves some requests waiting longer than wrk's 2 second limit (counted as timeouts in the data, 140-540 a run); haproxy serves the 2000 connections more evenly, with none over 2 seconds but a median wait 2 to 3 times longer.

Throughput

scenario (M4 / Intel / average)	no proxy	‖	0.9.4	1.0.1	devel	nginx	haproxy	‖	0.9.4 splice	devel splice	haproxy splice-auto
stream1, Gbit/s	62.0 / 44.4 / 53.2	‖	8.3 / 5.5 / 6.9	22.1 / 19.1 / 20.6	22.0 / 19.9 / 21.0	13.5 / 9.8 / 11.6	13.6 / 9.7 / 11.7	‖	25.1 / 29.2 / 27.1	45.7 / 31.4 / 38.6 *	29.5 / 30.6 / 30.1
stream16, Gbit/s	141.2 / 150.5 / 145.9	‖	8.7 / 5.6 / 7.2	20.9 / 18.9 / 19.9	20.9 / 18.8 / 19.8	13.5 / 9.9 / 11.7	9.5 / 9.2 / 9.3	‖	24.5 / 28.3 / 26.4	37.8 / 31.2 / 34.5 *	15.9 / 30.3 / 23.1
stream1-down, Gbit/s	61.8 / 43.1 / 52.5	‖	8.8 / 5.6 / 7.2	22.4 / 18.8 / 20.6	22.1 / 19.4 / 20.8	13.6 / 9.7 / 11.7	13.6 / 9.3 / 11.5	‖	47.9 / 34.4 / 41.1 *	47.4 / 32.0 / 39.7	30.4 / 31.0 / 30.7
http-ka-1k, k req/s	120.3 / 127.1 / 123.7	‖	14.1 / 19.2 / 16.7	6.0 / 6.1 / 6.1	15.8 / 18.1 / 17.0	37.0 / 36.5 / 36.8	44.3 / 37.3 / 40.8 *	‖	13.4 / 14.6 / 14.0	14.9 / 13.8 / 14.4	44.1 / 37.2 / 40.7 *
http-ka-1m, Gbit/s	71.6 / 67.5 / 69.5	‖	8.3 / 5.8 / 7.1	12.5 / 12.4 / 12.4	21.9 / 18.3 / 20.1	12.6 / 5.8 / 9.2	6.0 / 7.6 / 6.8	‖	33.0 / 26.6 / 29.8 *	35.3 / 23.9 / 29.6 *	5.9 / 24.2 / 15.1
http-ka-50k-2000, k req/s	84.5 / 85.7 / 85.1	‖	7.6 / 7.0 / 7.3	9.0 / 10.3 / 9.6	10.4 / 10.5 / 10.5 *	11.0 / 9.2 / 10.1	9.6 / 7.3 / 8.4	‖	9.1 / 9.4 / 9.3	9.9 / 9.0 / 9.4	9.6 / 7.7 / 8.6
http-close-1k, k req/s	48.7 / 52.1 / 50.4	‖	5.0 / 4.8 / 4.9	4.4 / 4.0 / 4.2	5.2 / 4.8 / 5.0	13.3 / 12.9 / 13.1	16.6 / 15.1 / 15.9 *	‖	4.8 / 4.4 / 4.6	5.0 / 4.4 / 4.7	16.7 / 15.1 / 15.9 *

Grace delay with splice

-s1 without grace delay, with the setting suggested in the documentation (-g8000,3,10: wait 10 ms before reading once 3 reads in a row averaged 8 KB or less), and with one meant to wait on answers only (-g65536,2,10: any 2 reads in a row; an HTTP request body is read at once, an answer of 50 KB or more is not). Measured in a session of their own (data/ *-grace.csv).

scenario (M4 / Intel / average)	-s1, no grace delay	-s1 -g8000,3,10	-s1 -g65536,2,10
stream1, Gbit/s	22.0 / 20.0 / 21.0 *	22.1 / 19.7 / 20.9 *	22.4 / 20.1 / 21.3 *
stream16, Gbit/s	20.8 / 19.5 / 20.2 *	20.9 / 18.4 / 19.7 *	20.7 / 19.1 / 19.9 *
stream1-down, Gbit/s	48.1 / 32.7 / 40.4 *	28.6 / 33.0 / 30.8	18.3 / 32.5 / 25.4
http-ka-1k, k req/s	15.4 / 15.4 / 15.4	15.5 / 16.4 / 16.0 *	15.5 / 16.6 / 16.0 *
http-ka-1m, Gbit/s	35.6 / 25.5 / 30.5 *	35.5 / 25.2 / 30.3 *	36.1 / 25.4 / 30.8 *
http-ka-2k-50k-2000, k req/s	9.0 / 8.3 / 8.6 *	9.0 / 8.3 / 8.7 *	9.1 / 8.5 / 8.8 *
http-close-1k, k req/s	5.1 / 4.5 / 4.8 *	5.1 / 4.6 / 4.8 *	5.1 / 4.7 / 4.9 *

• Grace delay makes little difference here: 4% more 1 KB requests over kept-alive connections, nothing elsewhere - except on the M4 with a single download stream, where it costs 40% (-g8000,3,10) to 60% (-g65536,2,10) of the throughput. These links are fast and local: reads are rarely small, so the delay seldom applies, and when it does it mostly adds waiting. It is meant for slow links carrying small packets, which this benchmark does not have.

Caveats

• Both machines are virtual: their CPUs cannot be pinned to physical cores, so absolute figures move between sessions; compare within a table.
• The roles have CPUs of their own but share the memory, and memory bandwidth, which copying proxies use most, cannot be split. On the Skylake host it may well be the limit; a CPU waiting for memory counts as busy, so this shows as less work per busy second rather than as idle time.
• wrk measures in a closed loop: a slower proxy is offered less load, so latencies compare only between runs of similar throughput, and requests over 2 seconds are left out of its latency figures.
• The haproxy versions differ between the machines (2.8 and 3.0), and so, slightly, do squid, tinyproxy and dante.
• In the tunnel scenarios proxychains-ng's work is done in the client: with a new tunnel for every request it sets the pace on the M4. Runs with a new tunnel per request or 2000 clients count a few failed requests (at most 34 in a run of 40,000 or more), every proxy alike.