bench.py: - the proxy gets one CPU, the client four, the origin three (8 CPUs), so the proxy is what runs out first - CPU time is the busy time of a role's CPUs from /proc/stat, softirqs included: with IRQ time accounting the cgroup's own figure leaves out much of the network work - every run records which side set its pace (proxy, client, origin), by the busy share of the role's CPUs and of its busiest thread - a 50 KB keep-alive scenario with 2000 clients - haproxy with splice: haproxy::splice-auto and haproxy::splice - wrk timeouts counted apart from errors; tools found by absolute path; leftovers of an interrupted run are cleaned up report.py turns runs into Markdown tables: throughput, the proxy's CPU per gigabyte or per request, its peak memory, splice and copying proxies in groups of their own, the best of each group marked. RESULTS.md has the comparison of 0.9.4, 1.0.1, devel, nginx and haproxy, with and without splice, on an Apple M4 and an Intel Skylake virtual machine, and how it was measured; data/ has the measurements. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| data | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| bench.py | ||
| build.sh | ||
| README.md | ||
| report.py | ||
| RESULTS.md | ||
Benchmarks
Compares the speed and the cost of 3proxy versions, and of other proxies doing the same job, on Linux.
Results of the latest comparison, with the setup they were measured on, are in RESULTS.md; the measurements are in data/.
How the measurement is isolated
The client, the proxy and the origin each run in a network namespace of their own, linked by veth pairs:
[bcli] 10.0.1.2 --veth-- 10.0.1.1 [bprx] 10.0.2.1 --veth-- 10.0.2.2 [bsrv]
wrk, iperf3 the proxy nginx (files), iperf3 -s
so they share no loopback, and a packet crosses the same path whichever proxy
is measured. Each role also runs in a cgroup of its own pinned to separate
CPUs (--cpus, default cli=0-3,prx=4,srv=5-7 for 8 CPUs), so one does not
take CPU from another, and RPS steers what each veth receives to the
receiver's CPUs, so the kernel's network work for a role is done on its own
CPUs too. The proxy's cgroup is created anew for every run, which is what
makes its peak memory readable on its own.
The proxy gets the fewest CPUs on purpose: the measurement is about the proxy, so it has to be what runs out first. Every proxy is given the same CPUs: nginx gets as many workers and haproxy as many threads as the proxy has CPUs; 3proxy runs a thread per connection inside the same cpuset. Logging is off everywhere.
CPU time is the busy time of a role's CPUs read from /proc/stat: its
processes and the interrupts and softirqs handled there. The cgroup's own CPU
time is not enough: a kernel with CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING leaves the
softirqs out of it, and that is where much of the network work is done (a
quarter of a proxy's CPU in these tests).
Every run records which side set its pace (bound): the role whose CPUs were
busy at least 90% of the time, or which had a thread doing so (an iperf3
stream is one thread, so one busy core is its limit however many CPUs the
role has). A run bound by the client or the origin says only that the proxy
can do at least that much.
none is no proxy at all: the client reaches the origin through the proxy
namespace with the kernel forwarding, the upper bound for every scenario.
What is reported
For every run, in a CSV under bench/results/:
| column | meaning |
|---|---|
gbit, rate |
throughput, requests per second for HTTP |
p50_ms, p99_ms |
latency from wrk (closed loop: compare at equal load only) |
prx_cpu_s, prx_task_s |
busy CPU seconds of the proxy's CPUs, network work included; the CPU time of its processes alone |
cpu_s_per_gb, cpu_us_per_req |
the proxy's cost per unit of work: the fairest figure, least affected by which side was the limit |
peak_mb |
the proxy's peak memory |
cli_util, prx_util, srv_util |
how busy each role's CPUs were |
cli_thread, srv_thread |
the busiest client and origin thread, as a share of one CPU |
bound |
proxy, client, origin, or none when nothing was busy all the time |
errors, timeouts, retrans |
socket errors and non-2xx answers; requests slower than wrk's 2 seconds; TCP retransmissions in the stream scenarios |
Repetitions rotate the order of the proxies, so drift over time (heat, the host) falls on all of them alike; the summary gives medians.
Scenarios
| name | load |
|---|---|
stream1, stream1-down |
one iperf3 stream through a TCP relay (3proxy tcppm, nginx stream, haproxy mode tcp), upload and download |
stream16 |
sixteen streams |
http-ka-1k, http-ka-1m |
HTTP over kept-alive connections through an HTTP proxy (absolute URIs), 1 KB and 1 MB answers |
http-ka-50k-2000 |
the same with 2000 clients at once, 50 KB answers |
http-close-1k |
a new connection for every request |
nginx is not a forward proxy: it answers absolute URIs by passing them to its upstream, which is the origin here, and it has no CONNECT or SOCKS, so only these scenarios compare like with like.
Running
Root, iproute2, iperf3, wrk, nginx (with the stream module:
libnginx-mod-stream on Debian and Ubuntu, nginx-mod-stream on
RHEL-like systems) and, to compare with it,
haproxy.
bench/build.sh 0.9.9.1 1.0.1 # tags into bench/bin/
NAME=devel bench/build.sh . # the working tree
CC="gcc -fcommon" bench/build.sh 0.8.13 # before 0.9, newer gcc
CC="gcc -fpermissive" bench/build.sh 0.9.4 # 0.9.x with gcc 14 and later
sudo bench/bench.py \
--proxy none \
--proxy 3proxy:bench/bin/3proxy-1.0.1 \
--proxy 3proxy:bench/bin/3proxy-devel \
--proxy "3proxy:bench/bin/3proxy-0.9.4:-s0" \
--proxy nginx --proxy haproxy
bench/report.py <csv> turns a run into Markdown tables: throughput, the
proxy's CPU per gigabyte or per request, and its peak memory.
After the binary, a 3proxy entry can carry options for both its services:
-s0 keeps 0.9.0 to 0.9.8, which use splice() by default, from using it, and
-ocTCP_NODELAY -osTCP_NODELAY turns Nagle's algorithm off on the client and
server sockets.
haproxy can be measured with splice() too: haproxy::splice-auto lets its
heuristic splice a direction once reads fill the buffer three times in a row,
haproxy::splice splices both directions always (option splice-request and
option splice-response). nginx has no splice() support, so it has no such
variant.
--scenario picks scenarios, --reps and --duration set the repetitions
and their length, --netem "delay 1ms rate 10gbit" puts a slower, longer link
between the client and the proxy, --mtu changes the links' MTU.
Caveats
- A virtual machine cannot pin its virtual CPUs to physical ones, so its absolute numbers move between sessions: compare within one session, and keep absolute figures for real hardware.
- wrk measures latency in a closed loop, so a slower proxy is also offered less load; compare latencies only between runs of similar throughput.
- The roles have CPUs of their own but share the memory: memory bandwidth, which copying proxies use most, cannot be split, and on some hosts it, rather than the CPU, sets the limit. A CPU waiting for memory counts as busy, so such a limit shows as less work per busy second.
- Versions are built with the Makefile they shipped with, so compiler flags
differ between them (0.8 builds with
-O2, 0.9.9 and later with-O3 -flto) as they did for their users.