Vladimir Dubrovin 6c9c4d51aa Build rpm packages against Enterprise Linux, not Ubuntu ... rpmbuild ran directly on the Ubuntu runner, so the packages carried Ubuntu's ABI: glibc 2.38, libssl.so.3 and libpcre2-8. No RPM distribution can satisfy that - RHEL 9 has glibc 2.34, RHEL 8 has 2.28 and OpenSSL 1.1 - so the rpms were installable nowhere. Build them in AlmaLinux 8, 9 and 10 containers instead, covering supported AlmaLinux and CentOS Stream releases. Release: 1%{?dist} already in the spec now expands, so the packages are named el8, el9 and el10 and can coexist. Two spec changes are needed for a build outside Ubuntu: debug_package is disabled. Enterprise Linux enables debuginfo extraction by default while Ubuntu's rpm does not; the build produces no debug sources, so rpmbuild aborted on an empty debugsourcefiles.list. /bin/3proxy is excluded from automatic requires. The installed configuration file is executable and begins with #!/bin/3proxy, so rpm generates a dependency on it. rpm 4.16 and later canonicalise that to /usr/bin/3proxy while %files declares /bin/3proxy, leaving a dependency that can never be satisfied and making the package uninstallable on el9 and el10. Enterprise Linux has no 32-bit ARM, so the armhf workflow now builds only the deb package.		2026-08-22 10:39:05 +03:00
..
workflows	Build rpm packages against Enterprise Linux, not Ubuntu	2026-08-22 10:39:05 +03:00
dependabot.yml	Add more docker platforms	2026-06-01 20:16:19 +03:00