41 of 112 configuration commands appear in a test. Record the rest as a
plan, ordered by how much of the product each gap covers against how much
of a fixture it needs, so the next person does not have to redo the survey.
Includes the two limitations left deliberately unasserted, and why pinning
the current behaviour there would be wrong.
tcppm and udppm forward a port each, so test both directions of each: a
request through the TCP mapper reaching its target, a datagram through the
UDP one coming back answered, and a mapper whose rules deny the client
answering nothing.
tlspr takes its destination from the name in the handshake, so point that
name at 127.0.0.1 with nsrecord and give the certificate the same name: the
name then both chooses where the request goes and is what the client checks.
dnspr answers from its cache, including the documented 0.0.0.0 record, which
is handed out as an address rather than withheld.
auto is asked to serve an HTTP proxy request, SOCKS4, SOCKS5 and a TLS
handshake on one port, and to make nothing of a request that is none of
them. Its protocols reach different places, so there are two origins.
The SOCKS UDP association was only checked for the port it binds. Send
datagrams through it as well, large and small, and check a second
association gets its own port - and that one bound inside an intport range
still relays.
A UDP service has no socket to connect to, so readiness is found by asking
until it answers rather than racing it.
Three arrangements, with key material generated for the run rather than
kept in the tree: a proxy wrapped in TLS, a proxy that reaches a TLS parent
and verifies it against the CA, and MITM.
The MITM case checks what interception is for: the decrypted request line,
URI and all, reaches the log, where the same request through a plain
CONNECT tunnel leaves only the host and port.
The origin runs in its own process there so the proxy log holds only what
the proxy saw, and log assertions wait, since a record is written when the
connection finishes rather than when the reply arrives.
Verification of the spoofed certificate is deliberately not strict: 3proxy
issues those without an Authority Key Identifier, which Python rejects
under its 3.13 defaults.
